|
| Should we raise the ante in our home games? |
| Yes, always |
|
42% |
[ 6 ] |
| Yes, but only every couple of weeks |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| Only on special occasions |
|
35% |
[ 5 ] |
| No, never |
|
21% |
[ 3 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 14 |
|
 |
Low Stakes Poker |
 |
Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2007 2:44 pm |
|
|
| Alex |
| Five of a Kind |

 |
| |
| Joined: 23 Sep 2005 |
Posts: 1134
|
| Location: Douglas, Isle of Man |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Home game at mine tonight. If you're up for it, be at mine for 8pm.
By the way, I've mentioned it a couple of times, but what do you think about increasing the stakes for our home games to 25p/50p?
As much fun as it is to see every flop, our games aren't as serious in a poker sense as they used to be. It's impossible to raise Accie off his blind, Marcus bluffs (!), and there is a straddle almost every single hand (which effectively doubles the stakes anyway).
My goal at a home game isn't to take all my friends' money, but it's not poker if it doesn't hurt a little when you lose your stack.
BTW, home game tonight will be usual stakes unless everyone agrees otherwise, so don't let these thoughts put you off playing.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2007 3:37 pm |
|
|
|
Whenever you agree to draw for seats Ill agree to up the stakes, I understand that in cash games you can choose the seat you want, but those are vegas cash games where the game lasts for days and days, in a homegame where its only 4/5 hours I think its better to draw.
I cant make it tonight, but ill be up for a cash game on saturday if anyone wants one as its just before I go home. |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2007 3:47 pm |
|
|
| BigD |
| HW Legend |

|
| |
| Joined: 23 Sep 2005 |
Posts: 1035
|
| Location: Edinburgh |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
I think once every while is ok, I dont think every couple of weeks would be that great mainly due to the fact that being stung for 2buy ins is the 100 quid and Im not sure how many of us in the game can honestly say the can afford 1 or 2 bad nights in a row. And a few people may buy in for less than £50 anyway.
I actually find the games with and enforced third blind really enjoyable, so I would suggest maybe 10p/20p/40p and let people buy in for £40/£50 if they want while still allowing those who want to sit with £20 to do so. |
|
_________________ "There's no such thing as bad beats, just bad plays that get lucky. Poker is a godless game, full of random pain." |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2007 4:22 pm |
|
|
| Stuart |
| Royal Flush |

 |
| |
| Joined: 24 Sep 2005 |
Posts: 667
|
| Location: Sliema, Malta. |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
| No pair No draw wrote: | Whenever you agree to draw for seats Ill agree to up the stakes, I understand that in cash games you can choose the seat you want, but those are vegas cash games where the game lasts for days and days, in a homegame where its only 4/5 hours I think its better to draw.
I cant make it tonight, but ill be up for a cash game on saturday if anyone wants one as its just before I go home. |
Just curious as to why you think it's best to draw for seats. Is it for comfort reasons or poker/positional reasons? My first priority is always getting a comfy seat - I don't give a second's thought to who's on my left etc.
By the way, I voted "Yes, always" on the poll. You can disregard my vote if you want since I'm not in the country any more. I agree with pretty much everything Alex said though, and hope that whenever I'm back there will be a £50 cash game to buy into! The stakes we have been playing are pretty small compared to what most of us play online. |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2007 5:07 pm |
|
|
| shnarf |
| Full House |

 |
| |
| Joined: 01 Nov 2005 |
Posts: 166
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
| i am in tonight. would be up for raising the stakes too it might make me play "more sensibly" and less likely to get bored and just start going allin all the time. we'll see tho. |
|
_________________ "Dealing flop" : 9s8d4d . Bet, raise, all-in... call. "I really hope you've got trips, if you have king high I'm screwed." |
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2007 5:09 pm |
|
|
| shnarf |
| Full House |

 |
| |
| Joined: 01 Nov 2005 |
Posts: 166
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
on second thoughts, lets play 5/10 with a min buyin of 400
PS: Can i borrow 400? |
|
_________________ "Dealing flop" : 9s8d4d . Bet, raise, all-in... call. "I really hope you've got trips, if you have king high I'm screwed." |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2007 5:32 pm |
|
|
| Alex |
| Five of a Kind |

 |
| |
| Joined: 23 Sep 2005 |
Posts: 1134
|
| Location: Douglas, Isle of Man |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
| No pair No draw wrote: | | In a homegame where its only 4/5 hours I think its better to draw. |
While I'm open to your point of view, I don't see why you think this. Choosing the right seat is just another one of the skills a good all-round poker player has, and if we were to draw for seats, that skill would be neutralised. If you don't like the seat you're in, you can swap with another player at any time.
As a completely random example, I prefer to sit with Marcus to my right, because I hate playing pots with Marcus out of position (take that as a compliment if you like, Mr Cole). I still have nightmares about that Omaha pot where Marcus bluffed me off the second nut flush - something I don't think he'd have been able to do were I in position.
I'm not the only one who chooses my seat with care (to some degree) - I've noticed that Scott and Marcus also both do it (Marcus was particularly keen to sit behind you and John last week, presumably so he could avoid facing a straddle every time he was in the blinds).
Mike Caro wrote a lot about picking a seat - check out his books if you want to know more.
Of course, Stuart's point about simply choosing a comfy seat is important too - perhaps more important in a game like ours.
| David wrote: | | I actually find the games with an enforced third blind really enjoyable, so I would suggest maybe 10p/20p/40p and let people buy in for £40/£50 if they want while still allowing those who want to sit with £20 to do so. |
That makes the game practically the same size (70p initial pot, compared to 75p with 25/50), and has the added fiddleyness of a third blind.
If we switched to 25/50, people could still buy-in for £10 or £20 if they wanted to, but the standard buy-in per night would probably be £50 to £100 instead of £20 to £40 like it is now. |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2007 5:43 pm |
|
|
|
The drawing for seats is purely for positional reasons, although I did hurt my back trying to deal from a chair in alex's.
Certain player who shall be known only as J. Cardle... hmmm may be a bit obvious... ill make it John C, decides to make it his lifes mission to sit on my left, and I think that some players have an advantage, so why not make it random?
Id also like to point out that the straddle is not put on by all players, myself and accie usually get robbed of about 5quid a night due to straddle/re straddle, so I think maybe making a 3rd blind like David said of 10/20/40 would be a good idea.
At the end of the day alex its your game, so you can run it how you like. |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2007 6:38 pm |
|
|
| Card Rack |
| Royal Flush |

 |
| |
| Joined: 03 Oct 2005 |
Posts: 707
|
| Location: Back In Edinburgh |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
I don't particularly mind the stakes we play (within reason) as long as the game goes ahead, rather than pricing people out of it. As long as it is fun and nobody eats beans on toast for a month after they get felted, I'm happy really.
On a seperate note, I did try to avoid being in the blinds when a certain player is in the straddle positions (let's call him JP, then lo and behold £2 blind pre flop raise utg+1 lol). Oh and cheers for the compliment Alex, I'll try to be on your left tonight then  |
|
_________________ "Life Is What Happens To You While You're Busy Making Other Plans" - John Lennon |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 12:08 pm |
|
|
|
Choosing a seat may be the skill of a poker player alex, but your seat is set in stone, does anyone have the choice to sit there???
Most people would have preferences as to who they would like on their left/right, I just think that drawing seats would give the game a better balance, even if you dont like playing out of position against marcus it's slightly unfair on him that you always sit on his left, even though he gets a nice cosy seat himself.
I think its pretty obvious that people are choosing their seats due to more than just comfort, so why not just draw for it and make it even |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 1:28 pm |
|
|
| Stephen |
| Royal Flush |

|
| |
| Joined: 23 Sep 2005 |
Posts: 521
|
| Location: Wherever there is danger. |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Well I'm definately in the dont care camp for seating - always choosing 'comfiest empty seat' when I arive - although I have some thoughts that I thought I would post on the matter anyway.
I think your logic is slightly flawed in the choosing the correct seat is an important poker skill arguement Alex. Which is not that its not an important skill but I think in the case of a regular game with the same players all the time then all of us could easily work out where we would like everyone to be relative to ourselves for the playing of said game. The 'poker skill' would be in watching a table full of strangers (online/casino) for 5 minutes then working it out surely!
Also Marcus I think its wrong to try to avoid being in the blinds when the 'straddler' is UTG. My reasoning on this is to imagine the effect on your expected return from each hand in the blinds - if (a) everyone on the table straddled around to the button or (b) no straddle at all. I know which I'd prefer. |
|
_________________ That doesn't even make any sense. |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 1:32 pm |
|
|
| Stuart |
| Royal Flush |

 |
| |
| Joined: 24 Sep 2005 |
Posts: 667
|
| Location: Sliema, Malta. |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
| Maybe you should either make live straddles illegal, or make it compulsory (if everyone agrees, like on HSP). |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 2:13 pm |
|
|
| Grunter |
| HW Legend |

 |
| |
| Joined: 30 Sep 2005 |
Posts: 660
|
| Location: Aberdonian |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Not that i play this game any more but i tend to agree with PJ on the drawing for seat thing.
Its your house you tend to sit where you like (which is fair enough) I was beginning to notice you always sitting on my left when I was down in ed too - probably for different reasons to why you sit to the left on marcus tho.
Anywho probably more importantly - not everyone can pick and choose their seat when there is only one game/table which is a tad unfair to the less vociferous or easy going players in the group who just make up the empty seats.
PJ, Id just wait till marcus sits down then sit on his right that way you know alex will be to the left of him so john is screwed.
Game stakes would depend on the ratio of students to working people if I was to give an opinion on that. Suppose it just dependes on the numbers you could generate. Agree with alex tho its got to mean something or it gets a little rediculous. |
|
_________________ It's not how you play the game that counts, it's whether you win or lose that matters |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 4:21 pm |
|
|
| Scott |
| Full House |

 |
| |
| Joined: 25 Sep 2005 |
Posts: 179
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
| Alex wrote: | | If you don't like the seat you're in, you can swap with another player at any time. |
This could mean a bit of musical chairs before the game starts with one person wanting to move then because of that another one etc...
If you draw for seats and make those positions final then at least that can be avoided. |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 4:25 pm |
|
|
| Card Rack |
| Royal Flush |

 |
| |
| Joined: 03 Oct 2005 |
Posts: 707
|
| Location: Back In Edinburgh |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
| Grunter wrote: | | probably for different reasons to why you sit to the left on marcus tho. |
I wouldn't have thought so, might be wrong.
Anyhoos last night a few of us bought for around £50 and there were no big pots really and it was a bit dull action-wise. Apart from the 7 2 hands I guess, I got reraised off my 7 2 by Scott's 7 2 bah, and Accie getting Stu off Queens in a big pot with our signature hand on a 997 flop!
On the seats issue, I think you should just pick a seat when you get in and sit down. You should be able to adapt to where other people are sitting and play accordingly. |
|
_________________ "Life Is What Happens To You While You're Busy Making Other Plans" - John Lennon |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 4:39 pm |
|
|
| Stephen |
| Royal Flush |

|
| |
| Joined: 23 Sep 2005 |
Posts: 521
|
| Location: Wherever there is danger. |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Hmm actually with my comments about the straddler if theres one person straddling every round then you will expect to make more in that hand wherever you are sitting so it doesn't really matter just the more straddles the better - unless your straddling . Guess I should have thought that one all the way through! |
|
_________________ That doesn't even make any sense. |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 5:04 pm |
|
|
|
| Quote: | | On the seats issue, I think you should just pick a seat when you get in and sit down. You should be able to adapt to where other people are sitting and play accordingly |
I totally agree, but people are not just choosing random seats for no reasons, last time I was alex's I sat down, John and furno got off their seats and moved to my immediate left, and Stu moved to 3 at my right, which in itself shows people have preferences.
Also marcus would drawin seats at random not mean that people would always have to adapt and play accordingly?
If it's totally random then no player has any advantage or any preference given to them. |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 5:34 pm |
|
|
| Card Rack |
| Royal Flush |

 |
| |
| Joined: 03 Oct 2005 |
Posts: 707
|
| Location: Back In Edinburgh |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
| No pair No draw wrote: | Also marcus would drawin seats at random not mean that people would always have to adapt and play accordingly?
If it's totally random then no player has any advantage or any preference given to them. |
That is true.
| No pair No draw wrote: | | even if you dont like playing out of position against marcus it's slightly unfair on him that you always sit on his left, even though he gets a nice cosy seat himself. . |
FWIW I have sat in the camping chair at Alex's on a number of occasions, so I don't get the I always get a comfy chair remark. It's a first come first served basis not some wanky elite hierarchy! People should just arrive on time and get a nice comfy seat, so if for example you're at mine on time you'd get a good choice of seat, then we could also start earlier. |
|
_________________ "Life Is What Happens To You While You're Busy Making Other Plans" - John Lennon |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 5:59 pm |
|
|
|
| Quote: | | FWIW I have sat in the camping chair at Alex's on a number of occasions, so I don't get the I always get a comfy chair remark. |
The remark was because the times I've played you have had the same seat, I also meant in position wise rather than comfort, although Im sure the camping chair is mighty nice.
The intermediate would be this..... if someone shows up late to a game then tough, you just have to take whatever seat is left and I've never argued that, however its pretty obvious that some players would like to have the table set up to suit them.
If seats are drawn at random then nobody can complain, I have no problems with any players on my left or right as long as they have not chosen the seat themselves.
Having the seats chose at random will as marcus said force players to adapt and play accordingly.
This all comes from the question of if we should up the stakes a bit, Im not particularly fussed with upping the stakes butif we have larger buy ins then i'd definately push for the seats to be drawn because all in all it just makes the game totally fair. |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 2:55 pm |
|
|
| Alex |
| Five of a Kind |

 |
| |
| Joined: 23 Sep 2005 |
Posts: 1134
|
| Location: Douglas, Isle of Man |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
I don't agree with you PJ, but I can see your points. I don't think it's unfair for players to be able to choose and change their seats.
Anyway, the fairest way to decide is to be democratic about it. I can run my game however I like, but there's no point in having a game if nobody turns up. To be honest, despite our silly fight of last year I have enjoyed having both you and John at my games recently, and I'd be disappointed if you stopped attending.
http://hwpoker.myfreeforum.org/about763.html
I'm willing to go with whatever the poll suggests. |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 7:14 pm |
|
|
| Stuart |
| Royal Flush |

 |
| |
| Joined: 24 Sep 2005 |
Posts: 667
|
| Location: Sliema, Malta. |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
| Alex wrote: | I don't agree with you PJ, but I can see your points. I don't think it's unfair for players to be able to choose and change their seats.
Anyway, the fairest way to decide is to be democratic about it. I can run my game however I like, but there's no point in having a game if nobody turns up. To be honest, despite our silly fight of last year I have enjoyed having both you and John at my games recently, and I'd be disappointed if you stopped attending.
http://hwpoker.myfreeforum.org/about763.html
I'm willing to go with whatever the poll suggests. |
I'd just like to echo this pretty much. Obviously I'm a good friend of Alex and took his side during that silly argument, but I've enjoyed playing with both PJ and John whenever I've played with them.
As Alex says, go with whatever the majority decides with regard to seating arrangements. |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2007 6:35 pm |
|
|
|
I was never going to abandon the game if we maintained the house rule of sit anywhere u want, but if the stakes are going up then I think its only fair that there is no advantage to any player, and IMO drawing for seats is the only way to be sure of it.
Again its your game and you can run it how you like, it's only a suggestion. |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 3:24 pm |
|
|
| Jonathan Antonius |
| Straight |

|
| |
| Joined: 07 Nov 2006 |
Posts: 89
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
"Certain player who shall be known only as J. Cardle... hmmm may be a bit obvious... ill make it John C, decides to make it his lifes mission to sit on my left, and I think that some players have an advantage, so why not make it random?"
Sorry this is late but i should point this out:
1. PJ get over your self, your convinced the reason that I want you and Mike Kelly to my left is for different reasons... believe me it isnt. I know how you play, and I know how you bet in certain positions etc.
2. I sat in that seat at alex's twice cause i had no choice... and i am in full support of randomly selecting seats.
3. I had Marcus and Alex to my Left!! Do you honestly think I chose to be there. Do u think I would do anything to be on your left, to the extent that I would want to be out of position against the two strongest players at the table??? I would have happily taken any other seat at that table. |
|
_________________ Arsenal Til' I DIE!!!!
Mrs Wenger: "Arsene, are you having an affair?"
Response: "95% No" |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 3:28 pm |
|
|
| Alex |
| Five of a Kind |

 |
| |
| Joined: 23 Sep 2005 |
Posts: 1134
|
| Location: Douglas, Isle of Man |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
| BlackJackJohn wrote: | | 3. I had Marcus and Alex to my Left!! Do you honestly think I chose to be there. Do u think I would do anything to be on your left, to the extent that I would want to be out of position against the two strongest players at the table??? I would have happily taken any other seat at that table. |
Cheers John, I'm flattered! |
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 3:34 pm |
|
|
| Jonathan Antonius |
| Straight |

|
| |
| Joined: 07 Nov 2006 |
Posts: 89
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
oh yeah... the stakes. increase them.
|
|
_________________ Arsenal Til' I DIE!!!!
Mrs Wenger: "Arsene, are you having an affair?"
Response: "95% No" |
|
|
|
Heriot-Watt Poker Forum Index -> Other Events
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
All times are GMT
Page 1 of 3
Page 1, 2, 3 Next
|
|
|
|
|
|